Archive for September 13th, 2009

STAR OP-ED 8/20/2009

September 13, 2009

STAR

REPORT FROM A COARSENED SOCIETY

September 13, 2009

A7A7

OLD WOODSMAN, OLD HEADLINE

September 13, 2009

A6

LISTENING TO OLD SALTS

September 13, 2009

A5A5

CARPE DIEM

September 13, 2009

A4

ANIMAL ADDITION

September 13, 2009

a1

THE NEW TERRORISM: TERMINOLOGY ATTACKS REALITY

September 13, 2009

A2

FUTURE TO THE BACK

September 13, 2009

A3A3

MULTIPLICATION TRICKS

September 13, 2009

I timed it right, entering Dave Kukla’s calculus class to kill an hour between volunteering in a couple of college algebra classes.  Dave is one of the smartest mathematicians I know, a wonderful man, who mentored me through his approach to teaching, and has a way to make the students love his classes.  He has received many awards, and he deserves every one of them.

About once a year, I can “scoop” Dave on something, if I am having a good year.  This time I had a good year.  Dave was talking to the students about the tangent to a curve at y=x^2 at the point (0,1).  As y got closer to 1 x^2 got closer to 1, but more slowly, since it was less than 1 and being squared.  As he started with 0.9 for y and 0.81 for x, he kept going with 0.99 for y and 0.9801 for x.  He then wrote down y=0.99999999 and said he would need the calculator for x^2.

“You don’t need a calculator,” I said from the back.  The place went deathly silent.  Dave looked at me and smiled.

“You want to tell me what it is?”

“Sure.”  And I wrote down the answer 0.9999999800000001.  The calculators couldn’t do it, for it had too many decimal places. I sat down.

“You were the one who gave me the idea,” I said from the back.

Dave looked at me, a quizzical expression on his face.  “What did I do?”

You brought it up last year, and I found the pattern.

square 9 and you get 81

square 99 and you get 9801  Notice the pattern.  One less nine in front, 8 the same number of zeros as 9s  and a 1 at the end.

square 999 and you get 998001.

“You had eight “9s” up there, so I wrote down 7 of them, put an 8 in the middle, followed with 7 “0”s and a one. ”  Pretty cool, right?  Dave nodded.  That’s what I like about him.  He appreciates this sort of stuff.  And he got me to think about it.  He’s brilliant.  I’m just a run of the mill pattern recognizer.

To multiply anything by 9, multiply by 10 first and then subtract the number.  After all, a number x (10-1) is the number times 10 minus the number x 1, or itself.  This is the distributive law in action!

It should follow, then, that multiplying by 99 is easy.  Multiply by 100 then subtract the number, for you are multiplying by (100-1).  So, 83 x 99 would be 8217:  (83 x100) – (83 x 1)= 8300-83=8217.

Multiplying by 11 can be done without great difficulty.  To multiply by 11, multiply by (10+1), which is multiplying by 10, then adding the number (which is multiplying by 1).  So, 123 x 11=(123 x 10) + (123 x 1)=1230 + 123 = 1353.

Multiplying by 50 is the same as dividing by 2 and multiplying by 100, since 100/2 is 50.  That means that 98 x 50=(1/2) x 98, or 49 x 100=4900.  In the same fashion as above, we can multiply by 51 or 49.  The neat thing about multiplying by 51, is that for an even number less than 100, it is half that number with the number appended.  Say what?  64 x 51 is half of 64 (that would be 32) with the number (64) appended.  So 64 x51=3264.

Multiplying by 25 is dividing by 4 and multiplying by 100:

87 x25 is 21 3/4 x 100.  But that is 2175, since 3/4 x 100 =75.

Try left to right multiplication:  23 x 7

Write 23 as 20 +3.  So 7 x 23 is 7 x 20, or 140, plus 7 x3, or 21.  Add 140 and 21 to get 161.  In my head, 43 x6=”6 times 40 is 24o; 6 times 3 is/are 18, and 240 plus 18 is/are 258. ”

354 x 6= “6 times 300 is 1800; 6 times 50 is 300, and 1800 plus 300 is 2100.  6 times 4 is 24.  Answer is 2124.

498 x 8= 3200 plus 720 plus 64 or 3984.  BUT, isn’t that also 8 x (500-2) or 8 x 500 (4000) minus 8 x 2, or 16?  Same answer.

This one is really cool:  Square any number  x, ending in 5.  The answer is (x)*(x+1), with 25 appended.

So, 85 squared is 8*9 with 25 appended, or 7225.

295 squared is 29 *30, with 25 appended, or 87025.

Multiply two numbers ending or beginning with the same digit, like 1:

31 x 31=  30*30 (or 900) +(3+6) x 10 (or 60) +1=961.

96 x97= 90 *90 (or 8100) + (6+7) 90 (or 1170) +(6*7)=9312.

This one came to me in the car on my way to a clinic in Safford:

The product of two numbers whose sum is an even number constant is maximal when the numbers are the same.  For every unit away from that maximum number, the sum decreases by the square of that unit:

So, two numbers whose sum is 100 have a maximal product of 50*50 or 2500 (this can be proven with simple calculus).

51*49=2499; 52*48=2496; 61*30=2500-11 squared or 2379.

It works in reverse:  84 x 78 is 81 squared minus 9 or 6561-9=6552.

ECLIPSE CHASING

September 13, 2009

Next annular solar eclipse, 15 January 2010.  I hope to be in Kenya for it.

Next total solar eclipse, 11 July 2010.  I hope to fly it from El Calafate, Argentina, viewing it over the Chilean fjords.

Three things are necessary for an eclipse of the Sun.

  1. The Moon has to be new; that is, between the Earth and the Sun.  This is the familiar  29 1/2 day cycle, which is 29.53059 days in length on average (it varies from cycle to cycle).
  2. The Moon has to near one of the nodes of its orbit.  The Moon and Earth’s orbits are very nearly in the same plane, but not quite.  The Moon can be 5.1 degrees above or below the Earth’s plane.  That being the case, the two planes intersect in two places called nodes.  The Moon is large enough that it doesn’t have to be exactly at a node but just near enough to cause an eclipse.  The cycle of the nodes. called the draconic (the dragon eating the Sun) averages 27.21222 days.
  3. The Moon and Earth’s orbit vary in distance from the Earth and Sun respectively.  The Moon can be close to the Earth and appear up to 7% larger than the Sun.  It can be far from the Earth and appear 10% smaller than the Sun.  The Sun varies within a narrower 3% in size, the Earth being closest in January and furthest from the Sun in July.  This anomalistic cycle is  27.54555 days long.  This determines whether an eclipse is total, with the Moon’s completely covering the Sun, or annular, where the Moon is inside the Sun so to speak, with a ring or annulus of sunlight around it.

223 synodic (typical) lunar months are 6585.3216 days.

242 draconic months are 6585.3572 days

239 anomalistic months are 6585.5375 days

18 years are 6574.365 days.

Put in 11 days more (and we have the 18 years 10 or 11 days (leap years) are almost exactly 6585.xxxx days above.  This means that the eclipses will repeat in similar fashion, but that extra 0.3 days moves the next member of the family about a third of the way west around the world.

I hoped this would be explained on one of the eclipse trips I went on but was told by a Sky and Telescope editor that people would think it was too nerdy.  (Astronomers already suffer that perception.) Frankly, anybody who goes to the effort of seeing one of these spectacles ought to be fascinated by the simple mathematics above!

Eclipses occur, therefore, in what is known as a SAROS cycle.  Each cycle is 18 years and 10 or 11 1/3 days depending upon leap years.  Eclipses are born near the poles as partials, become annular or total (or hybrid, where they are total in the middle and annular at each end), become partial and then disappear.  Each family of eclipses lasts about 70-75 cycles or about 1300 years.  An eclipse that begins at the ascending node of the orbit will start at the North Pole and move south with each family.  A descending node eclipse does the opposite.  The long eclipse of last July (and Baja in 1991, and Kenya in 1973) is Saros 136, a descending node eclipse now past its prime.  It will continue to give us total solar eclipses for the next couple of centuries, but the length of totality will be significantly shorter with each successive eclipse.

On the other hand, the eclipse of 29 Mar 06 has yet to reach its prime.  It will be the American eclipse of 8 April 2024 and will be extremely long in the 22nd century, reaching 7m29s, almost the maximum possible.

Hybrid eclipses mean that the Moon and Sun’s angular size are so closely matched that only at local noon, when the Earth’s curve bulges toward the Moon a few thousand miles, can there be totality.  The 8 April 2005 eclipse was one of those.

Many view eclipses without knowing or caring about all this stuff.  I think it is interesting, so I throw it in for those who are interested!