Posts Tagged ‘Philosophy’

TEASING

April 1, 2016

One Saturday night early in my internship, I was called to the cardiology floor to evaluate a patient with a fast pulse.  I walked into the room, today still able to remember what room and which bed he was in.  The man’s heart rate was about 150, and while he was tolerating it, he needed to have something done.  I hooked up an EKG, both confirming the rapid pulse rate and the diagnosis, atrial flutter, with 2:1 block, so the atrial rate was 300 contractions a minute and half of them were getting through to the ventricles.  Back then, before the anti-arrhythmic drugs we have today, massaging the carotid artery was one way to stimulate vagal tone and slow the heart rate.  Thinking I could see the EKG well, I started massaging the patient’s right carotid artery.

I can still see the patient as he had a seizure about twenty seconds later.  I took my finger off the carotid and he quickly woke up.  I looked more closely at what I thought I had been watching.  The vagal tone I stimulated was so strong that I blocked all atrial conduction, no longer 2:1 but rather 300:0, so that not one beat passed through the atrioventricular node to the ventricle.  I had put him into cardiac arrest.  Great job, Doc.  No pumping, no blood.  No blood, no brain function.  When the brain suddenly gets no blood, one of two things may happen: coma, which is the most common, or a sudden burst of electrical activity, a seizure. I once seized when I fainted.  A lot of “near death” experiences may be due to excessive brain stimulation due to severe hypoxia.

The attending showed up an hour later, looked at the patient, then the EKG, and finally me.  He held up the EKG, looked down his glasses, and quietly said, in a British accent,  “Are you the author of this?”  I was embarrassed beyond belief.  The patient was moved to ICU and fortunately made an uneventful recovery.

My misadventure with a patient’s neck was the butt of many jokes for the rest of my internship. For days afterward, every one of my fellow interns, when they saw me, would rub the side of their neck. Even today, I would be willing to bet money if one of the interns I knew saw me, the first thing he would do is put his hand on the right side of his neck and act like he was rubbing it.  He did that every time he saw me for the rest of the year.

The first few times it was tolerable.  Then, it became annoying and finally hurtful.  I admit it.  I screwed up.  Do I have to be reminded of it every time you see me?  What do you want?  Should I admit to being the worst doctor in existence?  Would that help?  Should I quit? Would that help?  Why are you doing this to me?  Have you never made a mistake?

Later, in practice, I saw a psych patient whom I was convinced didn’t have anything neurological going on.  A nurse disagreed, and she was proven right; the CT scan I ordered showed a large, benign brain tumor, which had caused the person’s problems.  I might add while this is always a consideration, I only saw twice a benign tumor causing psychosis in all the years I practiced.  Oh, I diagnosed the other tumor.  For years afterward, the nurse reminded me of my mistake.  Stuff like that hurts.  It starts to eat away at a person.  OK, I missed a tumor.  I am a bad person, a bad diagnostician, a bad doctor, and on and on up the ladder of inference.  Do you continue to  have to remind me?  Does anybody remind me, I wondered back then, about the diagnoses I did make correctly, the patients I did help, the times I was right and others were wrong?  What about the case of Wilson’s Disease that I diagnosed on the first visit in the office?

Teasing is toxic.  Maybe in small doses, it is fine, but only in small doses.  Let the individual poke fun at himself or herself.  And perhaps that is why I behaved the way I did last February 2, when the hike leader gave me a stuffed toy of a groundhog and told me quietly to start hiking before everybody else and put the groundhog on the trail somewhere where it could be seen.  About fifteen minutes up the trail, I stopped and placed the groundhog on the edge in the sun, because frankly I wanted six more weeks of winter.  I like rain; I haven’t seen enough of it in decades.

I waited, and when the first group of hikers arrived, one looked at the groundhog and pulled out his camera.  He was dead serious.  “Wow, a groundhog is up here!”

I thought he was kidding.  He had to be.  But the furry thing did look kind of real.  I quietly walked over and put my hand down on the stuffed animal.

“Oh my God,” the hiker said. “I fell for that.  I can’t believe it!!”  I didn’t say anything.

And I haven’t since.  The individual has mentioned the groundhog event to several people, but I have stayed quiet.  Sure, I could have teased him about it, but a long time ago, I learned what I should have known all along:  a good deal of teasing is toxic.  It hurts, and it isn’t appreciated, no matter what people say.  “Can’t you take a little teasing?” I heard as a kid.  I should have replied, “Can’t you take a little poison?”

GREAT EXPECTATIONS

March 23, 2016

It all started with a packaging error on some soy burgers I bought.  At home, I discovered a slit in the bottom of two that I didn’t see when I bought them.  Who knows how long the contents had been exposed to air?  How often do you check the packaging when you buy something?  For me, not often enough.

I returned to the store and told the manager, who was shocked.  I said I was going to look at the other packages they had to see if they, too, were defective.  When I checked the box that had the identical soy, sure enough, the two remaining packages in it had rips.  I took them back to the manager’s counter.

I had to wait, however, as I watched a woman with bleached blonde hair, maybe mid 40s, and a young man, who might well have been her son, discuss lottery tickets.

“We can’t afford too many,” she said.  “We need $20 for xxxx.”  I couldn’t hear what “xxxx” was.

I was stunned, as I watched them purchase six lottery tickets, some sort of scratch type, for $60, which the woman counted out using twenties, fives and ones.  It might have been a Raffle. You can’t win if you don’t play, right?  That was the catch phrase in Arizona.  You can’t lose if you don’t play would have been more accurate, and I can prove it.

Let us look at the expected value, which anybody playing the lottery should understand.  We ought to teach this in schools. If the expected value of something done is positive, over the long run it will be successful; if negative, over the long run, it will not be.

Here’s an example.  At a roulette table, you plunk down $1 on a roll of two dice.  If they come up double 3s, you get a 30-fold return—$30.  Well, it isn’t 30 fold, because you paid $1 to begin with.  It is 29-fold.  Don’t laugh, casinos get rich on these “minor points.”  You have a 1 in 36 probability that the dice will both be 3: 1 in 6 for each, and we multiply the probabilities when one doesn’t affect the other, a term called  independence. The probability of winning $30 is (1/36), and the probability of losing $1 is (35/36).  If you multiply these and then add, you get +$(30/36)-$(35/36)=$(-5/36).  That fraction comes out to about MINUS 14 cents per dollar bet.  Are there winners?  Yes.  The consistent winner is the casino.  Not only is it consistent, they can predict very accurately how much they will make, because in the long run (not a player’s time horizon), the casino will make 14 cents on each dollar wagered for that bet.

What I saw for a $10 Raffle ticket:

1 in 250 chance of winning $100

1 in 25,000 chance of winning $20,000

1 in 250,000 chance of winning $1,000,000

The exact calculations are more complicated, but the simple way works just fine.

You spend $10, and you have a 1/250 chance to win $100, an expected value of $100/250 or $0.40, 40 cents.  You also have a 1/25,000 probability of winning $20,000, and that is $0.80, so the expected return of both is $1.20. Add to that the 1 in 250,000 chance of winning $1 million, $1,000,000/250,000=$4.  The total expected return on $10 spent is $5.20, give or take.  That’s the plus.  The minus is $10(249/250)=$9.96.  The expected value is $5.20-$9.96=  MINUS $4.76.  The pair spent $60. If we looked at a lot of people buying, all of them, they would on average lose about $28.50.  One of those $20s that one comes in to the store with, and nearly a ten spot as well, won’t be seen again.  Do that weekly for a year, one will lose nearly $1500 on average.

The lottery is very coy about posting long lists of numbers that won $100.  Sounds like a great deal, except that first, they really won $90, because they paid $10 for the ticket.  Secondly, the list of those who lost is about 120 times longer.  We don’t see that one.

Here in Oregon, 93% of the money spent on the lottery goes to payouts.  Sounds good, except that the big payouts go to very few people.  BUT A LOT OF PEOPLE WIN A LITTLE, LIKE $100, AND THAT’S A HUGE PROBLEM.  This is called variable ratio reinforcement.  Winning occasionally keeps one playing.  Never winning at all causes one to quit sooner.

There is a very strong correlation between low income and high use of the lottery. Why do people play?  Answer: they see this as the only way out of poverty.  The probability is exceedingly high, however, that they will only go deeper into poverty. The lottery is a regressive tax levied on those who can least afford it.  The lottery steals from those who don’t understand math, probability, or how our brain can lie to us.  When the money goes to education, a noble cause, it is being paid for by those who have the least money: the very poor spend 9% of their income on the lottery.  If one makes $13,000 a year, that is nearly $1100 they spend on the lottery.  If one has difficulty making ends meet, this is going to push them over the edge—with high probability—and I can define that probability exactly.

I never forgot what my statistics advisor said about expected values:  “If it is positive, I will beg, borrow, steal every dollar I have to play.”

It becomes absolutely certain at some point that somebody will win Powerball.  We can predict that as well.  If there is a Powerball with a probability of winning equal to 1 in 110 million (roughly equivalent to your guessing correctly a minute I choose between the signing of the Declaration of Independence in 1776 and now), and 330 million play the Powerball, the expected value of winners is 3.  Three people are expected to win; the probability of exactly 3 is about 22%; the probability that between 1 and 5 will win is nearly 7 in 8, and the probability nobody will win is about 5%, quite small.  In other words, one can make remarkably accurate probabilistic statements what is going to happen.  Did you guess my minute? (It was 3:32-3:33 a.m. 15 August 1846).

I’m lucky; I live comfortably.  Still, I bend down to pick up a dime or a penny if I see one.  If PetsMart gives me a $3 coupon for doing a survey, I will do it.  If REI gives me a dividend, and I am planning to buy something, I will buy it with the dividend and furthermore try to get it when the item is on sale.  I use coupons when I shop, I comparison shop, I don’t drive 30 miles for cheaper gas, because it’s more expensive to do so, I pay my credit cards off every month, I try not to get a tax refund, because it means I loaned the government money, and I DON’T PLAY THE LOTTERY.

But occasionally, I do silly things with money.  The store agreed that the ripped packages I returned, and the two others in that I found that were also ripped, needed to be removed.  I found two good packages, but they were not on sale, so I actually had to pay to replace them.  I paid $4.40 for doing the store and any customer who bought those a favor.  Small price for what I learned about the lottery.

The expected value for doing a good deed was negative.  In the long run…

EERO, EPOR AND THE 577R ALLELE

March 2, 2016

It did me good to read that Finnish skier Eero Mäntyranta’s success in winning seven Olympic medals in cross country skiing was likely due to a genetic mutation that increased his oxygen carrying capacity 25-50%.  He wasn’t the only Finn who was this fortunate.  I wondered at the time why Americans never were on the podium in those events.

It also did me good when I read in Outside about a man who could hold his breath six minutes—yes, six minutes— and used that skill to dive to tag threatened hammerhead sharks.  A comment was even made by Laird Hamilton that this man was unique.

Hamilton, one of the great big wave surfers, is unique, too.

It did me good to read that virtually every Track and Field star has the 577R allele in some form, enabling them to do things that the rest of us can’t.  It isn’t a matter of training harder, as some have told us, or “mental toughness”; nope, it’s genetics.  Now, that doesn’t mean one can’t train and improve.  There was evidence that Lance Armstrong improved his muscle performance 8 per cent through training.  Unfortunately for the sport, he improved it another smidgin by taking drugs, although he was far from alone.  All Tour de France riders are genetically exceptional, and at the top of the top, a fraction of a per cent advantage matters.  Some argue that genetic mutations don’t make for a level playing field. Well, we aren’t all created equal.

For years, reading about all these guys and gals who could do everything from surf to big wall climbing made me feel inadequate, despite my wondering that these skills were genetic.  Now it’s clear.  You either are born that way or you aren’t.  Nurture is essential, mind you, but nature creates a few special people every generation.  I am not one of them and never will be.  On the other case, I’ve never taken performance-enhancing drugs.  I was drug-free.  Maybe there is a genetic mutation for that, too.  Or maybe good nurturing teaches one not to cheat.

For most of my life, I tried to play sports well.  I am competitive.  But I have a modest ceiling.  My medal in 1966 for the third place 400 yard freestyle relay at the Delaware state swimming championships was my being a moderate size fish in a puddle, since Delaware, besides being the first state, is the second smallest.  I played baseball but never thought to try out for the team.  Basketball? I played third string in the city league, although one fabulous day I hit 20 free throws in a row at a schoolyard.

In cycling I was in the top 14% of the El Tour de Tucson 109 mile finishers.  That meant I placed about #736.  I trained long hours and had done all the right things; my result wasn’t bad, but hardly noteworthy.  In only one sport—skiing—was I good, and that was because I started young, took lessons, and had a lot of days on snow.  I was an excellent technical skier, but I couldn’t race well.  As a kid, I dreamt of being a pro baseball player; I never once dreamed of being a top skier. I was neither.

I feel better knowing that when I watch a track meet, or a good basketball game, I am watching people with chromosomal genetic code that I and nearly all others do not have.  More importantly, I understand the pain of those who train and train and train, but they didn’t have the right 577R allele to be part of the U.S. Olympic Team.

I feel better knowing that I was right when I argued with my cycling friends that it was genetics that made top riders.  All the training I did made me better and faster, but I reached a low asymptote.  I do believe I have a slight genetic advantage for endurance. I did a 200 mile bike ride once in just over 12 hours. In the 2002 Cochise County Classic, I was part of a small group that had our own support, and from mile 100 to mile 160, the end, I was pulling at the front two-thirds of the time, stamping out a solid pace, seven riders in my slip stream,  as we finished in about 8 hours, averaging 20 mph.

I was sixth out of 20 finishers.  Not even podium.

I was right when I argued that if I could be a top cyclist by training, anybody could multiply three digit numbers in their head, the way I do, simply by training.  That stopped most arguments, because people knew then that my skills were genetic.  Sure, I practiced math a lot, but I had this stuff in my genetic code from day 1, just like Yo-Yo Ma and cello;  Laird Hamilton in big wave surfing, Chris Froome in cycling, or Stephan Curry in basketball.

We should celebrate these people, and we do, paying them good money and cheering for the the ones we like to succeed.  No doubt they eat right, they train right, they do everything they can to reach their potential.  Some do it better than others, and they are household names.

I no longer feel inadequate when I read about these people who grace the articles in Outside, Sports Illustrated or Golf Digest.  I am reading about genetics, what how random mutations can positively affect performance, and—I think—to a lesser extent what training does.  Training is what we can control, and allows us to do reasonably well, be it learning a language or hiking up a mountain.  None of us will be noteworthy except maybe in our small group.  Nope, it is the mutations who make the stars, the names we know.  They work hard, to be sure, to separate themselves from other stars, but they are in a league of their own.

Now all we need is a mutation that leads to idea generation that would fix the rest of the human race, so we wouldn’t trash the planet and drive ourselves to the brink of extinction, which we will.

Maybe it’s time for better nurture.

MY ANNUAL BILL TO BE AN AMERICAN

February 18, 2016

After the New Hampshire primary, a friend commented that she didn’t want her taxes to go to send other people’s children to college, a comment on Sen. Bernie Sanders’ plan for free college education.

I was surprised and a little disappointed to hear that.  Through grants, to name one example, government is involved in education.  My taxes go to many places that are irrelevant to me.  I have no children,  I don’t eat meat, and I’m not a woman.  Should I have the right not to be taxed for public education, grazing fees on my land, and Planned Parenthood?  Of course not.  Is my friend going to vote for the other side, who will defund  Planned Parenthood and require that all rape-caused pregnancy be carried to term?   I was against the Iraq War long before it started, but my taxes went for that debacle.  I will never drive on roads in Texas again, so why should my taxes go for that?

While we are at it, we could get rid of the phrase “hard earned dollars.”  Sometimes they are, sometimes not.  In any case, the phrase is worn out.

There are things that the federal government must do, because we as people living in towns, cities and states simply cannot do them ourselves with our own resources.  We can’t clean up after a devastating natural disaster without federal help.  Yet, more than 30 Senators voted against Hurricane Sandy aid, even though many were from states that FEMA has been to many times after devastating storms.  We can’t defend ourselves against major foreign powers, and we can’t pay for medical care for the elderly or infirm.  We can’t build a national system of roads, and we can’t have a national weather service, the NIH or the CDC without the federal government.  These and so many other programs are essential to our well-being.  Live in the South?  Maybe you are glad the National Hurricane Center exists.  Government shouldn’t do everything, but there are things government can do.  And should.

People ought to save for retirement.  I did.  Sure, there are many who buy toys or travel everywhere without putting anything away and then find themselves old with no money.  I am not sure what is going to happen to them, except they will have less—but not zero—money.  We ought to make it easier to save, and we have to an extent with IRAs.  We need to do more, however, because if a senior is destitute, somebody somehow has to care for them, unless we are a different country from the one I thought we were. I had good fortune and a good job.  In the 45 years of being between 20 and 65, had I developed a significant medical problem, and I hadn’t had insurance, I would have become bankrupt.  Many have.  It doesn’t matter whether or not a person was saving money or whether the problem was their fault.  They need a safety net.  We can argue about the size of the safety net or whether people like me should receive it, just because we reached a certain age.  That is fair.  But the fact our taxes go to pay for something somebody else gets doesn’t a priori make it wrong.  That’s what elections are about.  My taxes are payment for my annual bill of being an American, and frankly, it is a great bargain.

People ought to have a healthy lifestyle, too.  Why should I pay for smokers who develop emphysema or lung cancer?  Or those who eat the wrong diet and suffer the consequences?  Or motorcyclists who have accidents and weren’t wearing helmets?  The list is endless.  I could add to it the question “Why should I pay for future cases of Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy caused by football, soccer, or hockey?”  Nobody forced those people to play the game.  Many made a lot of money.  Why, I could ask, don’t they fund themselves?

What we have accomplished with our collective will and our federal government is so pervasive in our lives we don’t recognize it but take it for granted.  It isn’t; it may be removed at any time.  When FEMA was decimated under Bush, we saw what happened to New Orleans.  Bush’s response to Katrina did as much to bring down his presidency as Iraq.  Had Social Security been privatized, the recession would have bankrupted millions of people who get by on something they were never intended to get by on.  I shudder to think what will happen if Medicare is taken away.  It can be.  All it needs is a president, a Congress, and a Supreme Court willing to do it, and if one thinks that is impossible, one is unaware of reality.  I am already preparing for 2017 and 2018, when the other side is in power and the safety nets are removed.  I am counting on voters finally waking up and showing up to vote in November 2018 to take back Congress and stop the madness.  Being American voters, I may be hoping for too much.

Every time we drive on a federal highway/Interstate, we are seeing what our taxes went for.  Every time we go into a national forest or a national park, we see it. The food labels for nutrition that are so helpful are a federal law.  We ought to have point-of-origin food labels and label GMOs. The medications we take are safer, due to the FDA.  If one flies, there is the FAA, NTSB, and the TSA.  Indeed, we now have the TSA, because prior to 2001, the airlines were responsible for security, and we saw what happened.  Pilots are trained to certain standards.  Flight attendants are, too, and everything that they say was legislated.

Regulations exist to ensure there is a certain baseline of information that is given to the public.  Regulations in food safety exist because without them, we have no guarantee that each food service facility will do the right thing.  Regulations exist, because every year we see what happens without proper regulation.

Here’s my plan for who pays for college:  I would bring back the Civilian Conservation Corps and the GI Bill, make young people serve their country and then give them the education they want.  College for young people is a better investment than the Iraq War was. My downpayment for being an American was serving my country.  The annual payment is called taxes.  I get a say in what happens.  That’s my social contract.

Let’s bring it back.  It will help bring us together.

 

 

THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN FAIR AND FAIRLY

January 24, 2016

I travel all the time but have not paid the $100 for the TSA pre-check. However, I get selected for this line in LGA more often than not. I think that they (Delta) know the frequency that I travel and do not consider me a risk. I will tell you that it ticks off the people on my team that have paid for the service.

This was a recent Facebook post from one who was randomly chosen to use the TSA pre-check line. TSA does this to encourage more to be pre-screened.  It cost me $84 to get mine, and I had to drive to Roseburg to be fingerprinted, but the few times I fly,  I don’t wait in line.  I am at an age when convenience is worth a lot, even if I can’t attach a dollar value to it.

“It ticks off the people on my team that have paid for the service.”  In other words, somebody got something for nothing, They had to pay for it, IT IS NOT FAIR, IT IS WRONG, AND IT MUST BE CHANGED.

Fairness is an American obsession.  Many want to end Food Stamps, now SNAP, Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, because a few have abused it to buy things they shouldn’t have. Food Stamps is one of the least abused, most useful of all federal programs.  Still, any unfairness bothers people.  In Kentucky, able-bodied adults between 18 and 50 with no dependents must work, volunteer, or take classes for 20 hours a week for SNAP.  Heaven forbid somebody get something for nothing.  Many can’t find jobs, and I know first hand the difficulty to find volunteer opportunities. If we want “must work programs” let’s have mandatory national service for the young and able-bodied on welfare with an organized list of thousands of jobs, thousands of supervisors, so that we can fix infrastructure and support the three gifts America gave the world: liberty (military service), the national parks (build trails, fix the backlog of jobs), and public education (help in the schools).  Then let’s pay them by giving them a reasonable stipend followed by four years of education in a field of their choice after completion of their duty.  Such work gives people dignity, and I can’t attach a dollar value to dignity, either.

Because somebody cheats on welfare, many want to disband it. One should pull himself up by his own bootstraps, by golly.  This is difficult if one doesn’t have shoes, let alone boots. If we tried to enhance family planning, rather than trying to destroy it, we would have fewer children, less poverty, and require fewer jobs.  Freeloaders are employers who come to a city lured by tax breaks, not single women with children on welfare.  Every corporation that skirts IRS laws is a freeloader.

In college, I discovered for the first time in my life that hard work didn’t bring success and good grades.  It wasn’t fair, but life isn’t. When asked whether it was fair to call Reservists up for duty in Vietnam, JFK replied, “There is always inequity in life. Some men are killed in a war and some men are wounded, and some men never leave the country, and some men are stationed in the Antarctic and some are stationed in San Francisco. It’s very hard in military or in personal life to assure complete equality. Life is unfair.”

Want to know something that wasn’t fair?  Read Paul Kalanithi’s “My Last Day as a Surgeon” or “How long do I have left?”  He was, the past tense a sad way to refer to a remarkable human being, a neurosurgical resident, diagnosed during his training as having Stage IV non-small cell lung cancer.  He died two years later at 37.  As a resident, he was a skilled communicator and physician.  He learned in his last two years of life to enjoy the simple things as realizing his reassurance of a patient mattered.  He was a physician-scientist who could have been a writer, too.  It wasn’t fair that he died so young.  He quoted his chances of getting his disease: 0.00012%

As a physician, a lot of my stress was seeing people who had medical problems that weren’t fair.  I saw the 55 year-old at 2 a.m. with a sudden onset of a Grade V (the worst) subarachnoid hemorrhage, who was going to die. Not fair.  I saw a colleague develop a glioblastoma multiforme, which killed him at age 52. Not fair.  Or the 41 year-old man who in the ED at midnight, with a big stroke, whose wife said, “He’s going to die,” and I remained silent, because I knew she was right.  Not fair.  The 25 year-old woman devastated by MS.  Not fair.  The 28 year-old who broke his tibia, who coded one night at 3 a.m.  He didn’t make it.  I can still see the ugly, huge pulmonary embolus at his autopsy.  A gifted classmate, hiking by a Colorado river, falling, hitting his head and drowning.  He was 27.  Not fair. Notice that four of these were sudden.

This is life, or maybe death.  Bad things happen.  Some we can prevent, and some we haven’t a clue how to prevent.  I try to think that I must make each day count in some way, because we don’t have forever, and time is passing.  Atrial fibrillation was my game changer.  My probability of having a stroke has significantly increased.  Not fair that I inherited some bad genes, but biology doesn’t really care how I feel.  It just is. I’m moving on. The clock is really ticking now.

One question we must address as a society is how much unfairness is…for lack of a better word…fair.  The other is how to treat people fairly.

The tax code is unfair and could be changed.  It is not a malignancy.  I don’t think it is either fair or appropriate to pay women less who do the same work as men.  I don’t think it is fair for a child to die of a preventable disease because the parents didn’t believe in vaccination. I don’t think it is fair that people should go bankrupt because they had a medical condition that nobody could have foreseen.

We aren’t born equal, we don’t have equal opportunities and life will never be fair.  We can, however, treat people fairly who end up on the wrong side of the luck scale.  Any of us could be one of them.

Any time.

DOWNRIGHT AMERICAN

January 12, 2016

I got an email from Senator Jeff Merkley’s office saying there would be a town hall meeting with the senator Saturday afternoon up in Coburg.  All the places where Merkley holds such meetings are small towns.  Lane County is big, Eugene the County Seat, but Mr. Merkley, from a small town in southern Oregon, held his Lane County meeting in Coburg.  Good for him.

I arrived at the IOOF Hall to find it full.  I could have probably wrangled a seat because I’m graying, but seats are for old people, if you get my point.  I stood in the back.  I had never been to one of these town halls and had no idea what was going to happen.  I was amazed that I didn’t get patted down.  Five years and a day prior, my Congresswoman was holding a town hall when she got shot in the head from 3 feet away.  She amazingly survived.  Six others did not, including a county attorney, 63, a “9/11” girl, 9 years old, and women in their late 70s who were in the wrong place at the wrong time.  Nothing changed, and we can’t even put fingerprint codes on firearms, which would keep children from firing them.  America the armed; America the afraid, America the land that used to innovate, America where a billionaire boor stands a damn good chance of becoming president.

When I signed in, I was asked if I wanted to ask the Senator a question. I chose not to, but had I, I would have been given a ticket with a number on it, and as numbers were announced, if my number were called, I would have held up my hand, given a microphone, and then talk one-to-one with a US Senator.  That’s pretty cool.  I’ve seen a few important people in my life, but it’s been a long time since I saw a significant public figure.

Merkley gave the first question to a little girl, who asked him something about charter schools.  I didn’t hear the question, which was just as well, because I think we ought to support public education and limit the numbers of people who are homeschooling and using for profit schools that aren’t doing anything better.  I was the son of a public school superintendent who could have put me in a private school named after one of the duPont’s.  A lot of superintendents did that for their children, but Dad enrolled me in one of the public high schools. Had to do with integrity and belief in the system he ran.

I survived—and thrived—in a public school, where I learned about diversity, dated a Jewish girl, and had my first girlfriend the daughter of a single mother.  I never felt special; I worked hard.  The private schools probably had better curricula, but I there were plenty of damn smart students in my school.  We were integrated; back when people thought one black student was integration, a third of our student body was black.  If we set public education up to fail, it will, and America will fail, too.  Our choice.

Anyway, back to Merkley.  He was asked two questions about the LNG pipeline that might go to Coos Bay.  This is a bad idea: a Canadian company wants to build it and use eminent domain, which they can’t do.  The young people, one of whom walked the pipeline’s proposed path, weren’t articulate, but their fervor spoke volumes—clear cuts, carbon footprint, and putting a terminal in a major earthquake zone.

A teacher, retired Air Force, had ideas for gun control in schools and wanted more than a form letter back from the Senator. That one went to a staffer on the spot.  The teacher, like everybody else in the room, was polite. One guy was upset about the Malheur insurgents, saying that it was continuing because it was a bunch of white guys with guns.  If those were black guys with guns or Muslims with guns, he said, I think the response would have been a little different.  Merkley listened and said he was getting updates.  Lot of Oregonians are upset about outside agitators coming in with their camo and their big assault weapons.  I think that’s terrorism and treason, but I stayed quiet.   You got a problem with how federal land is run, you use lawful means.  Merkley added that the ranchers were in jail because of a mandatory sentencing law, and that if one breaks a chair in his office that could lead to a 5 year jail term.  He didn’t think that right.  Maybe he can change it.  It might stop future problems.  Mandatory sentencing for drug problems has helped make incarceration a major US industry.

Somebody with chronic Lyme disease had a question, and the lady in front of me was having trouble with getting Social Security and paying for her expensive insulin.  She gave such a scathing diatribe about the pharmaceutical industry that Mr. Merkley said he couldn’t improve upon it.

Town halls aren’t for discussions of foreign policy.  They are discussions of local and state-wide issues that affect everyday people.  Senators need to hear this, and Merkley was listening.   There isn’t a lot he can do as a member of a minority party.  He has some ideas, but working across the aisle isn’t easy to do these days.  When one side refuses to negotiate, says your arguments are all wrong, and they are right, it’s difficult to govern.

I missed a chance to ask something near and dear to me, but that can wait for maybe Mr. Merkley’s 280th town meeting next year.  Yes, the Senator goes around, along with the senior senator, Ron Wyden, to every county every year.  Next year, I am going to ask Mr. Merkley about mandatory national service.  I may get a couple of boos, but maybe not.  I think every young person should serve America in some non-sectarian way for at least a year and maybe two.  It would do them good.  They might get to see other parts of the country and understand why Mississippi, Carolina, Vermont, Michigan, or Nebraska folks think differently from us up here.

We need infrastructure rebuilt, we need help in the schools, nursing homes, highways, animal shelters, the Parks, which have a several billion dollar maintenance list that isn’t being funded.  We give the young people room and board, a decent stipend, and have them do something as part of service to America.  When their term is up, they may have a job waiting for them, or they may to go back to school, which will be paid for by taxpayers.  There would be a lot less student debt and a lot more people in college who should be and not in college who shouldn’t be. Being told one has to show up at a certain time or place builds character.  I don’t have the idea totally right, but it’s valid and needed.

At a town hall, I would have to say those 9 sentences about as fast as Ralphie  told his parents and Santa that he wanted an Official Red Ryder Carbine-Action Two-Hundred-Shot Range Model Air Rifle.  The Senator is busy.

But wow, to stand up at a town meeting and ask a senator what you think the country ought to do.  Why, that’s downright American.

OUTSIDE AGITATORS

January 5, 2016

In my youth, I took part in peace rallies, working for Eugene McCarthy in 1968 as part of the “clean for Gene” group.  I was called an “outside agitator” and worse by those who disagreed with my beliefs.  Indeed, back then, “Law and Order” and “outside agitators” were almost always right wing pronouncements.

The recent takeover of an unoccupied building at Malheur National Wildlife Refuge by armed men, from outside Oregon, protesting the jailing of two ranchers, is at the moment at a divide between a non-issue that went away quietly or a major conflict that will be remembered for decades.  Two things are immediately clear.  These are outside agitators and they broke several laws.

The facts are not yet clear, and I may be in error, unlike my detractors, who know everything with complete certainty.  The spark was the jailing (insufficient time) of a rancher and his son, who about a decade ago set fire to about 150 acres to remove invasive plants so that they could graze their cattle—on federal land—where they held a grazing lease.  Apparently one of the fires was set to cover up deer poaching.  The law requires a minimal sentence, much like drug use.  The lack of all the facts has not stopped people on social media from opining about government takeover of land, need to privatize all land, and let “the people” (at least of their political persuasion, not mine) run things. The ranchers themselves voluntarily reported to jail and did not want publicity, according to their lawyer.  That didn’t stop the mob from singing “Amazing Grace” in front of their house, proving Obama’s famous comment about America’s Red Crescent “Their guns and their religion,” which while a political faux pas, was and is dead right. Nevertheless, the insurgents felt this was unfair and occupied a building on the Refuge. Cliven Bundy’s son (Bundy had a standoff against the Feds 2 years ago about failure to pay $1 million in grazing fees.  For fear of bloodshed, the Feds backed down) said they were prepared to stay there for “years.”  .

I’ve been to nearby Burns, Oregon, and I can’t imagine staying for years in Malheur.  Obviously, somebody is supporting these people, since most of us have to make money to take time off, especially to destroy the federal government.  Maybe the money came from the million Bundy’s dad saved on not paying grazing fees for putting his cattle on my land.  Yes, my land.  And that is what I am concerned about.  We lease federal lands so that ranchers can run cattle on it.  Then if anything happens to the cattle, like predation, they want compensation from we the people.  Twenty-five years ago, in Arizona, one of these ranchers trapped and killed bears that were allegedly killing his cattle on federal land.  My wife and I became vegetarian on the spot.  Still are.

Mind you, the ranchers in the Malpai Borderlands Group work well with The Nature Conservancy, and their joint efforts should serve as a model, not Bundy’s Tea Party-no negotiation group, which doesn’t work, because saying no and not yielding one point doesn’t work in a pluralistic society.

More than half the land in America’s West is federally owned, and since I am part of the government, it is partly my land, too.  There is a lot of resentment of land being “locked up” as wilderness when it can be logged, mined, snowmobiled, hunted, jet skied, regular skied, or otherwise used to make money.  People use public lands—my land as much as theirs—to make money, often off people like me.

The idea that we “lock this land up,” is false, but like so much of what my detractors say, it is a catch phrase, to be repeated often enough so it is treated as fact.  We hold this land in reserve for those whose lives have yet to begin.  We hold it in reserve so we will still have it.  Should we auction it all off to the highest bidder, who knows where it will go?  I do know what happens when nearly all the land is privatized.  It’s called Texas, where 2% of the land is federally owned.

When I saw the Hill Country, I was dismayed at all the fencing.  The restrictions aren’t just a Texan issue, however. Here in Oregon, a rancher sold a huge ranch to a Chicago man, who closed all the trails that were once accessible to the public.  That would be you and me.  Lack of access to places that we used to go to are the first result of privatization of public lands.  Those are the people who are locking land away, not the feds.  Privatize the land, and those with money get it. So, unless one is a millionaire, few will get land, certainly not the guy who can barely pay his mortgage, take care of his kids, pay for his F-350 and the ammo he uses. I wonder why that guy hasn’t yet figured out that the Republican party is using him.

Last century, the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness came close to being privatized.  It would have allowed resorts, dammed waterfalls, logged everything, and one of the great wildernesses in this country—the most visited today—would have been lost.  If we privatize the Grand Canyon, uranium mining will occur, and people will no longer have the experience of total quiet, miles from the nearest person, in a civilization where such quiet is a rarity.  I’ve experienced these wonders and want others to do so as well.

If we privatize Malheur, that will be the end of a special place for wildlife.  Oh, cattle ranchers—some, anyway—will make more money, although not much, because grazing fees are dirt cheap to begin with.  Tell me, Mr. Bundy, what happens when an ORV or a snowmobile cuts a fence containing somebody’s cattle?  Who is going to adjudicate?  If they think that won’t happen, they are too dumb to own a firearm.  They may feel that progressives like me don’t have a right to visit some of these places.  What about future generations?  Do we get booted out of the country?  Is that what America is about?

Answer:  I think so.  The Far Right has money and buys and cheats its way to power.  We are headed for an oligarchy like Russia, with the same results.

I want Malheur under a total, quiet siege.  Keep the media in Burns.  The less coverage, the less these guys can strut on national news. No power, no water, no food, no utilities, no medical care.  Nothing. If one wishes to give up his weapon and leave, he may do so.  He may be subject to a misdemeanor, but I just want him gone.  Nothing else should be allowed in or out, until everybody leaves.  These guys are terrorists, using terror— numbers and their weapons—to take over federal land and push for overthrow of the government.  That is terrorism, regardless of where they come from Algeria or Austin, Libya or Lubbock, Medina or Missoula, Baghdad or Boise, Yemen or Yreka.

Hopefully, this will not be another Waco, which spawned Oklahoma City, just like the Iraq War ultimately helped spawn ISIS. If people bombed your innocent family, killing all of them, might you consider terrorism as a reasonable response?  The “$1.7 billion” war, “Shock and Awe,” and “Mission Accomplished” have finally came home to roost.

It’s time to stand up to right wing terrorism and keep public land public. The government is not a nebulous entity.  It is we.

Finally, language matters.  This is not a militia.  This is terrorism.

HIKING THROUGH THE SOLAR SYSTEM

January 4, 2016

The Obsidians are a hiking club in Eugene sponsoring hikes, climbs, bike trips, snowshoe and cross-country trips, bus trips to distant parks, a summer camp with a week of day hikes and catered meals, and … in town hikes.

I took my first hike with the club about a month after I arrived, after 3 hikes qualifying for membership.  One of the officers wanted me to lead hikes right away, but I insisted I had to know a trail before I organized and took people to an area.  Three months after a summer of exploring  the central Cascade foothills, scores of hikes, I led my first one.

My twenty-eighth hike as a leader wasn’t to Collier Cone, Obsidian Loop, Larison Rock, or Browder Ridge.  It was a hike in town, walking the one to one billion scale model of the solar system.  I got the idea one day while strolling through Alton Baker Park, where the Sun, a 4 foot high model, stood.  Why not do a 7.5 mile hike through the scale model of the solar system?

And so, on a chilly New Years’ Eve Day morning, a dozen people who had signed up for the hike and I began our walk near the duck ponds at the western edge of the park, near the Willamette River.  I had reviewed the facts about the planets: size, day length, orbital period, presence/absence of a magnetic field, temperature, but when I reached the Mars post, the first stop, I put the notes away. I wasn’t sure what I would do, but I wasn’t going to recite facts.

We began at Mars, not Mercury, because the post was nearest where we parked, I wanted to have the hike move in more or less a straight line, and we were parked closest to Mars.

I quickly realized I was at a daylight star party, except the stars were planets, and I didn’t have a telescope.  Everything else was the same.  I was teaching to several interested adults near me.  Earth-Moon was second on the walk, and I discussed the size of the Earth, far smaller than a marble at this scale, and its 150 meter or nearly 500 foot distance from the Sun.  I showed the vast emptiness of the solar system, how far we were from Mars, and how little was in our neighborhood.

Mercury has the day where the Sun rises, gets high in the sky and then sets.  Really must be something to see.  I mentioned while many thought Mercury was difficult to see, there are times it is easy.  Indeed, I saw it from downtown Chicago one night years ago.

I remembered  that Venus has no magnetic field but instead spoke of the resonance between 5 passages of Venus by Earth, 584 days apart, and how that time is almost exactly 8 Earth years.  I told them of the transits of Venus I observed in 2004 and 2012.  I said transits were so rare that in 2012 the grandchildren of a newborn baby, whose mother held him up to the eyepiece, might see the next one if they lived long enough.

IMG_1129.JPG

Transit of Venus, 5 June 2012

When we reached the yellow large ball that marked the Sun, I spoke of how the Sun generated heat through nuclear fusion, producing prodigious amounts of helium every second from fusing hydrogen, yet would still exist for many more billions of years. I talked about fusion of helium into other elements, all the way to iron, in larger stars, where fusion no longer gave off energy, and the star had a problem, because gravity pulling in and heat expanding no longer balanced each other.  The resulting collapse formed all the other elements; the presence of iron in our blood, magnesium in chlorophyll, silicon on the sand we walk on were all parts of nuclear fusion from a star that existed prior to our Sun.

We next crossed the Willamette and walked on the South Bank trail.  Shortly, we reached Jupiter, and I talked about the Galilean Moons, how I once saw them covered by the waning crescent Moon, reappearing one by one as the Moon slowly moved.  I told them about the dark spots caused by the collision of Shoemaker-Levy comet on Jupiter in 1994, and a time I saw Jupiter in daylight.  I forgot to mention the special night I saw Jupiter, a meteor and lightning flash all at the same time, 25 years ago.  When one observes the night sky, there are many such surprising gifts.

Saturn was a little more than a half mile further away. I mentioned the rings, how they could open up part way, viewed from Earth, but could also be edge-on.  I was asked if we could see the rings from directly over Saturn.  Sadly, we cannot.  Twenty years ago, I showed people Saturn with edge-on rings at a non-astronomy conference I attended at Palm Desert, California.  I spent three nights in a parking lot with my telescope, each night having more and more people, until the final night I had a steady line of 40 waiting patiently.  I don’t remember what I learned at the conference, but I never forgot the nights outside.  I suspect many of those who looked through the eyepiece felt the same way.

I also talked about the 28 Sagittarius-Saturn occultation in July 1989, when Saturn passed in front of the star, which appeared to move through the ringlets, only 20 meters wide, but each band clearly discernible as I watched Saturn move—yes, I saw it move—until the star was between Saturn and the innermost ring, a truly once in a lifetime sighting.  I was in my element now.  The temperature had risen, I was not lecturing but rather discussing how the planets affected my life, my observing, and were part of me.

Uranus rolls around the Sun, its axis directly pointing at the star.  I wore a button in 1986, 30 years ago, commemorating the arrival of Voyager 2 at the planet.  Voyager 2 took the Grand Tour, money well spent, NASA arguably at its best, as the craft used the planets as a slingshot, a close fly-by of Jupiter, using Jupiter’s gravity to go to Saturn, using another gravity assist to go to Uranus. I remember the ice rilles on Miranda, one of the moons, and the gas clouds of Uranus itself.

A mile later, we reached Neptune, 2.8 miles from the Sun, its 165 year orbit meaning it moved only 2 feet a day at this scale.  My memory was Neptune All Night, the show on a late August evening in 1989, when I observed Neptune while listening to the discussion of what was being sent back by the spacecraft.  Neptune had a big dark spot and rings.  I also remember the high winds reported on Neptune, the geysers on Triton, completely unexpected, the way all the visits to all the planets revealed the unexpected.

My hike through the solar system was not at all what I expected.  I hope to repeat it annually.

WEARING ANOTHER’S STRIPES

December 31, 2015

“Everything is going to be OK, Mr. Roberts!”  the young man ran in to the hospital room where I was examining Mr. Roberts and just as quickly left.

My first thought was, “Who was that guy?”  My second thought was that Mr. Roberts was most assuredly not going to be “OK” for the near future, maybe never.  I was just an intern, years ago, and had to evaluate the unfortunate man who had a large stroke involving the dominant hemisphere, middle cerebral artery territory, affecting expressive and receptive speech and paralyzing his right side.  At least Mr. Roberts didn’t understand the optimistic words.

The “intruder” was a physician’s assistant for a well-known local internist and was busy writing orders when I returned to the nursing station.  Because he worked for a senior physician, he made himself important by association.  Stripes are what nautical and airline officers wear on their sleeves or shoulders. Stripes should not be transferrable, but a lot of people think they are.

I stayed quiet that day; as an intern, I was at the bottom of the hospital pecking order, and the PA was “wearing the stripes” of the doctor for whom he worked.  My training was more than his, I was working longer hours than he (nobody worked longer hours than interns in those days), but length of training, knowledge and hours worked stood little chance against a forceful, sure of himself individual.  I would see that in spades with the surgeons with whom I would deal.  There was no way I would have told the PA that Mr. Roberts had a long, difficult road ahead of him.

A month later, that longest year of my life, I found that the OR Nurse for cardiac surgery wore the stripes of the two cardiac surgeons for whom she worked.  Every intern had to spend time on the cardiac surgery service. The pair made my 24 day rotation hell.  The two fed off each other, driving me to tears on one occasion, classic physician behavior back then that is slowly dying out as the old guard finally moves on.  I was a physician, not yet licensed to be sure, but I didn’t deserve to be treated as the “hired help,” either.  The two were equal opportunity nasty to everybody; they threw instruments, hit me on the wrist with an instrument if I weren’t holding it properly, demanded I hold a retractor better, when I couldn’t see what I was doing, and thanked me only 5 times on the 12 multi-hour cases which I helped them.  I found I could fight back with my intellect, because I was able to correctly answer every anatomy question they posed during a case, often with a bored tone of voice that was my passive-aggressive way to say, “Can’t you do better than that?”

One day, I finally had one of those rare moments in life where I said exactly the right words at the right time, the “Perfect Squelch.”  I was holding a hemostat, a clamp, and my thumb was too far through the handle.  “SMITTY!” the senior surgeon shouted.  (I hated that name).  “DON’T HOLD YOUR INSTRUMENTS LIKE THAT!!! YOU DON’T HOLD YOUR SILVERWARE LIKE THAT, DO YOU?”

I quietly replied, “Dr. Maloney, I don’t use silverware.  I eat with my fingers.”  Other than Dr. Maloney’s unsuccessful attempt to comment, the room remained silent the rest of the case.

Their nurse treated me as the hired help, too.  While I didn’t like how she looked at me, her mannerisms or her tone of voice. I just told myself that my time as an intern wouldn’t last forever.  Every day was another 0.27% gone.  I wonder how she was treated by the surgeons themselves.  One subsequently had a nervous breakdown, and I actually felt sorry for him.  He was an arrogant jerk, but his life was going south and mine was not.

Wearing the stripes literally came to pass the following two years, when I was in the Navy.  The concept of the wife of the Captain being in charge of the other wives was “wearing his stripes.” Some women used their power well, however, perhaps supporting a pregnant wife of a Navy Ensign, her officer-husband overseas for 8 months, and needing help.  Others tended to act as their husbands, only that backfired if a wife was a professional with her own career and quite capable of living independently from her husband if she had to.  Like mine.

Over the years, I have seen others wearing the stripes.  I’ve seen them on the face or heard it in the voice of an Executive Secretary or a doctor’s nurse.  It was a very clear, “my boss has a lot of power, so therefore I have it, too.”  Had I more interpersonal skills, I would have learned to cultivate these people so that they would look forward to hearing from me and do things that I wanted.  Alas, I did not have such skills.  I called things as I saw them, and that wasn’t always popular.

I came by my attitudes honestly.  My father was once superintendent of schools, responsible for everything in the district. Not everything he did was popular; indeed, we frequently got phone calls at various hours, since our number was in the directory.  One night, I heard my mother on the phone in my parents’ bedroom, a place I never went.  Sound travels, however, and I couldn’t help but overhear her say something along the lines of “That’s not my job, and I am not going to listen to your tone of voice any longer.  Good-by.”  She hung up.  When she left the bedroom, she saw me.  I don’t remember the look on her face, but I never forgot her words.

“Your father is getting paid to do this.  I’m not.”

She might easily have said, “He can wear his own goddamn stripes.”

BIG GOVERNMENT STRIKES AGAIN

December 26, 2015

Big government is again stepping in and regulating our right to have a good time.  More specifically, they are blocking progress, for we may not easily have package delivery to our door from on high.  If they would only let people alone, things would be fine, because people invariably do the right thing.  The market tells us so.

Yes, drone regulation is upon us.  Drones can now be tracked to their owner.  They have to be, because there have been issues with unregulated drones that couldn’t be tracked.  I knew it would happen.  Drones were interfering with civilian aviation, 237 instances of a drone’s coming with 200 feet of a manned aircraft in the first nine months this year.  An aircraft on final approach moves 200 feet in less than a second.  Ninety per cent of the incidents occurred above 400 feet, the legal limit for drones.  Regulation helps, but people still find ways around rules. I guess it is like  “leash your dog”; that rule is for other people, not for your special drone or dog.  Drones have interfered with wildland firefighting by having so many over a fire at one time that air tankers couldn’t safely drop their loads.

Lack of sufficient regulation in the financial industry almost brought down the world’s economy.  Turns out that a lot of NINJA mortgages were bogus, and when the mortgages weren’t paid, the whole house of paper came tumbling down, as did the economy.  Solution?  Roll back regulations further.  Wow.  Do I move to Canada now or wait?

This, Sens. Paul, Cruz, Rubio, Graham, and every other anti-government crusader, is why we need regulation.  I don’t want people to die unnecessarily; I really don’t want them to die because some arrogant jerk flew his drone where it shouldn’t have been flown, like into a jet engine, causing a crash.  Let me state my point succinctly, before I give more examples.

PEOPLE CAN’T BE TRUSTED TO SELF-REGULATE.

Yes, many regulations are annoying.  Those who went to Louisiana to help out after Katrina had to go through a daylong course on sexual harassment, when people needed urgent help. Smart people know when to bend rules, like no chain saws in the wilderness, when a 30 million tree blowdown in 1999 trapped many canoeists and lives were at stake.  Chain saws were brought in.

Even with regulations, we have problems with our food supply.  We have E. coli, Salmonella, Listeria and other outbreaks. Without such regulations, what would we have, a microbial free for all?  Market choice?  It might do some of these senators good to get food poisoning.  Maybe they would understand.  If the signs in restrooms makes one person a day wash his hands, it is still better.  Does it prevent disease?  I don’t know: It’s difficult to count non-events.  It does not make regulation any less valid.

What about medical care?  I practiced in a hospital where we had a neurosurgeon with bad outcomes.  Periodically, somebody complained, a partner of mine had to investigate. When he finished, he was accused of trying to badmouth the competition.  What if you were a patient from out of town and didn’t know the quality of care?  Come to think of it, how do you know, anyway?  It’s bad enough to have a nasty disease or problem—I’ve been there.  It’s reassuring to know that the physician taking care of you has had adequate training to do what you need. This doesn’t just happen by chance, you know.  It requires regulation, and the same physicians who hated “administration” couldn’t get enough of us administrators involved when someone was practicing in their turf.

What about the elderly who get ripped off by non-licensed financial planners and lose thousands of dollars?  Is that market forces?  It’s fortunate that I wasn’t given regulatory authority over Wall Street.  I would have started with a 0.125% tax on all transactions—both sides— effective immediately. I would have taxed all bonuses at 80% to limit what people made for moving money around, rather than doing something more useful, like say instilling the love of reading, math, music, or art into the lives of children.  And I would have taxed income over $2 million at 80%, same reason, and I’d remove the cap on deductions for Social Security.  Wealth transfer?  You bet. Until we have a way to control our population and teach them good money managing skills, we can’t have people dying from lack of money to get medical care or put a roof over their head. Some who get that money are lazy slobs.  Yes.  But far, far more are single mothers with children, mothers who bore children because they didn’t have access to family planning, which the Republicans want to ban. Care for the poor, isn’t that what religion taught you?

Finally, the only instance I know where a few bad apples have not ruined something for the many is the matter of responsible gun ownership. California and Washington, with strict rules on gun ownership, have 30% fewer gun deaths per 100,000 than the other Western states.  Oregon, with somewhat strict rules, has fewer as well.  The common ground for those 3 states is universal background checks.  The authors were careful not to say causal, but there appears to be no other cause.

Almost certainly, fewer guns lead to fewer suicides. This happened dramatically in Australia with a buyback of perhaps 20% of privately owned guns.  Suicide rates by firearms fell 57%.  Suicide by gun requires minimal thought and a quick action which is almost always fatal.  Pills are less effective.  If I wrote an op-ed about this subject, almost certainly somebody, anonymous, of course, would write, ”let them kill themselves,” an incredibly insensitive comment which by itself should disqualify that person from owning a firearm.  Mind you, I don’t believe anything will change. Gun sales are increasing at a time when I continue to avoid gun ownership.  Afraid of being in the wrong place at the wrong time?  Sure.  But absence of a gun in the house lessens my risk of death significantly.  Guns have to be locked up to be safe; unlocking them and storing them by a bed is to me a bad idea.  A guy answered the phone one night and shot off his ear.  Yes.

Good guys with guns?  Jimmy Hatch, a Navy SEAL, writes eloquently why that is a bad idea.  He has been in many gunfights and describes the confusion one faces in one.  He concludes good guys with guns are far more likely to cause more deaths in these situations.

Good thing I’m not in charge.  I would regulate Wall Street.  I’d require software that would shut down a drone that was more than 400 feet in the air, and fine the owner.  I would pull a Gromyko on guns, for Gromyko was the master at getting what he wanted:  Ask for something outrageous, complain throughout every part of the negotiations, and complain bitterly about the result, too, how much one gave away.

Gromyko got what he wanted all along, simultaneously laying a guilt trip on the other side.  Brilliant.